Rev. Kyle Walker’s letter to Austin Seminary

page1image400

May 13, 2014

Faith Presbyterian Church Envisioning a World as Generous and Just as God’s Grace

The Faculty of Austin Seminary
c/o Rev. Dr. Theodore J. Wardlaw, President Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary 100 E. 27th Street
Austin, Texas 78705

Dear colleagues,

As a commissioner from Mission Presbytery to this year’s General Assembly, I am grateful that Austin Seminary has joined with my alma mater, Columbia Theological Seminary, in conversation about the opportunities before us as a church at General Assembly. I’ve taken the weekend to consider carefully the words of Austin Seminary and share both seminary statements with our session at Faith Presbyterian Church. I hope you will allow me to accept the invitation to constructive dialogue and to share my concerns with you.

I realize the future of institutions and many of our careers are held in the balance should the church split further. Many have already lost their livelihoods to downsizing and many more are likely even with a General Assembly void of conflict. In addition to these losses, let us remember also the loss of those who have been denied admission to our leadership and denied participation in our sacred rites simply because they are born lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer. Make no mistake that I’m mindful of the price all people suffer psychologically, emotionally, spiritually and physically during times of such institutional instability, contraction, and anxiety. All are in need our solidarity and not our shame.

I am convinced that young people of strong faith are looking for churches that speak boldly, love deeply, and walk clearly in the way of Jesus Christ. We know that nothing stays the same forever and the gaps of years between rapid and pervasive change are smaller and smaller. Simply put, we must respond to the questions of our age with courage, competence, and in a timely manner. We simply can’t let our society down by failing to speak truth lovingly to power even as we welcome dissent and disagreement.

Looking the statement over further, though, I did find particular phrases problematic. If the paragraph beginning with “The issues we are facing are complex.” were to be removed as well as the last two sentences of the previous paragraph and one phrase from the next paragraph, “…pressing too quickly for changes not widely supported across the church and from…”, the statement would eliminate most of its patronizing, presumptuous and discouraging tone. I also think it worth removing the sentence, “Along with promoting justice, however, we believe we are also called to “love kindness, and walk humbly with God.” This sentence sets up a false dichotomy as if love and justice are somehow a tradeoff. They are not.

I know marriage is only one issue before us as an assembly and not the only issue to which your statement speaks. It is noteworthy, however, that a review of the PCUSA social witness policy shows that we have been dealing with marriage equality since 1976. To evaluate a resolution which might be arrived at in 2014 as “premature” sounds as if 38 years is too soon without giving an indicator as to what constitutes a reasonable time to speak on these questions that are very relevant to our times as evidenced by 304 corporations, 17 states, the courts, and perhaps soon the NFL officially embracing marriage equality.

1314 E. Oltorf Austin, Texas 78758 512-444-1314

These times are not dissimilar to the time when MLK, Jr. spoke from a Birmingham jail to those eight white Alabama clergy or when Nelson Mandela called for truth to be spoken so vehemently that it landed him at Robben Island and imprisoned for 27 years before he called for reconciliation. It has always been the church that has been slowest to stand for justice during movements for equality and justice. It was the mainline church in the southern U.S. that gave reinforcement to racism. For this reason, what we say and how we say it is very important paying careful attention, especially as Southerners, to who is being asked to “wait.”

It must be said as well that the church has also been a key catalyst toward greater justice and greater peace when the wisdom of the church has caught up with the wisdom of Jesus Christ whom we follow.
Proudly, many Presbyterian churches, including the one in Canyon, Texas that nurtured my call, were among those that marched in the streets to end segregation in both church and culture. We see this as well when the World Alliance of Reformed Churches pressured the Dutch Reformed Church of South Africa to abandon apartheid. Where will we, the Austin Presbyterian community, choose to be during this moment? A catalyst? Or reinforcer of the status quo?

You need to know that this statement is heard, rightly or wrongly, as a call from our local seminary to make doubly certain that those who are halfway out the door feel as if they are not cut off from the body of Christ while those who have been longsuffering and committed to the church can wait a little longer. This presumes that those leaving are not being accommodated or are being asked to leave. Nothing could be further from the truth. An aborted sense of justice while calling for a biased peace in order to “play it safe,” is not a way to bear witness to Jesus Christ who sacrificed credibility with the powerful to reach out in love to the powerless.

Remember these words of scripture from 2 Timothy, “…for God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control. Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony about our Lord…”

If I were to have hoped for the best word from our theological institutions at this time, it would have rather been to encourage all of us to act without fear, to deal with each other with charity, and remember these words of the Belhar Confession (with apologies for the language) that we are called upon to study this year as well. I have attached it in hopes that you will join me in reflecting upon them as we travel together to General Assembly in Detroit.

With Gratitude and Respect,

Rev. Dr. Kyle M. Walker, Transitional Pastor

cc: The session of Faith Presbyterian Church Queer Alliance

page2image24360

-2-

Confession of Belhar September 1986

1. We believe in the triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, who gathers, protects and cares for the church through Word and Spirit. This, God has done since the beginning of the world and will do to the end.

2. We believe in one holy, universal Christian church, the communion of saints called from the entire human family.

We believe

  • that Christ’s work of reconciliation is made manifest in the church as the community of believers who have been reconciled with God and with one another (Eph. 2:11-22);
  • that unity is, therefore, both a gift and an obligation for the church of Jesus Christ; that through the working of God’s Spirit it is a binding force, yet simultaneously a reality which must be earnestly pursued and sought: one which the people of God must continually be built up to attain (Eph. 4:1-16);
  • that this unity must become visible so that the world may believe that separation, enmity and hatred between people and groups is sin which Christ has already conquered, and accordingly that anything which threatens this unity may have no place in the church and must be resisted (John 17:20-23);
  • that this unity of the people of God must be manifested and be active in a variety of ways: in that we love one another; that we experience, practice and pursue community with one another; that we are obligated to give ourselves willingly and joyfully to be of benefit and blessing to one another; that we share one faith, have one calling, are of one soul and one mind; have one God and Father, are filled with one Spirit, are baptized with one baptism, eat of one bread and drink of one cup, confess one name, are obedient to one Lord, work for one cause, and share one hope; together come to know the height and the breadth and the depth of the love of Christ; together are built up to the stature of Christ, to the new humanity; together know and bear one another’s burdens, thereby fulfilling the law of Christ that we need one another and upbuild one another, admonishing and comforting one another; that we suffer with one another for the sake of righteousness; pray together; together serve God in this world; and together fight against all which may threaten or hinder this unity (Phil. 2:1-5; 1 Cor. 12:4-31; John 13:1-17; 1 Cor. 1:10-13; Eph. 4:1-6; Eph. 3:14-20; 1 Cor. 10:16-17; 1 Cor. 11:17-34; Gal. 6:2; 2 Cor. 1:3-4);
  • that this unity can be established only in freedom and not under constraint; that the variety of spiritual gifts, opportunities, backgrounds, convictions, as well as the various languages and cultures, are by virtue of the reconciliation in Christ, opportunities for mutual service and enrichment within the one visible people of God (Rom. 12:3-8; 1 Cor. 12:1-11; Eph. 4:7-13; Gal. 3:27-28; James 2:1-13);
  • that true faith in Jesus Christ is the only condition for membership of this church.

-3-

Therefore, we reject any doctrine

  • which absolutizes either natural diversity or the sinful separation of people in such a way that this absolutization hinders or breaks the visible and active unity of the church, or even leads to the establishment of a separate church formation;
  • which professes that this spiritual unity is truly being maintained in the bond of peace while believers of the same confession are in effect alienated from one another for the sake of diversity and in despair of reconciliation;
  • which denies that a refusal earnestly to pursue this visible unity as a priceless gift is sin;
  • which explicitly or implicitly maintains that descent or any other human or social factor should be a consideration in determining membership of the church.

    3. We believe

  • that God has entrusted the church with the message of reconciliation in and through Jesus Christ, that the church is called to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world, that the church is called blessed because it is a peacemaker, that the church is witness both by word and by deed to the new heaven and the new earth in which righteousness dwells (2 Cor. 5:17-21; Matt. 5:13-16; Matt. 5:9; 2 Peter 3:13; Rev. 21-22).
  • that God’s lifegiving Word and Spirit has conquered the powers of sin and death, and therefore also of irreconciliation and hatred, bitterness and enmity, that God’s lifegiving Word and Spirit will enable the church to live in a new obedience which can open new possibilities of life for society and the world (Eph. 4:17–6:23, Rom. 6; Col. 1:9-14; Col. 2:13-19; Col. 3:1–4:6);
  • that the credibility of this message is seriously affected and its beneficial work obstructed when it is proclaimed in a land which professes to be Christian, but in which the enforced separation of people on a racial basis promotes and perpetuates alienation, hatred and enmity;
  • that any teaching which attempts to legitimate such forced separation by appeal to the gospel, and is not prepared to venture on the road of obedience and reconciliation, but rather, out of prejudice, fear, selfishness and unbelief, denies in advance the reconciling power of the gospel, must be considered ideology and false doctrine.

    Therefore, we reject any doctrine

• which, in such a situation, sanctions in the name of the gospel or of the will of God the forced separation of people on the grounds of race and color and thereby in advance obstructs and weakens the ministry and experience of reconciliation in Christ.

4. We believe

  • that God has revealed himself as the one who wishes to bring about justice and true peace among people;
  • that God, in a world full of injustice and enmity, is in a special way the God of the destitute, the poor and the wronged;
  • that God calls the church to follow him in this, for God brings justice to the oppressed and gives bread to the hungry;

-4-

  • that God frees the prisoner and restores sight to the blind;
  • that God supports the downtrodden, protects the stranger, helps orphans and widows and blocks the path of the ungodly;
  • that for God pure and undefiled religion is to visit the orphans and the widows in their suffering;
  • that God wishes to teach the church to do what is good and to seek the right (Deut. 32:4; Luke 2:14; John 14:27; Eph. 2:14; Isa. 1:16-17; James 1:27; James 5:1-6; Luke 1:46-55; Luke 6:20-26; Luke 7:22; Luke 16:19-31; Ps. 146; Luke 4:16-19; Rom. 6:13-18; Amos 5);
  • that the church must therefore stand by people in any form of suffering and need, which implies, among other things, that the church must witness against and strive against any form of injustice, so that justice may roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream;
  • that the church as the possession of God must stand where the Lord stands, namely against injustice and with the wronged; that in following Christ the church must witness against all the powerful and privileged who selfishly seek their own interests and thus control and harm others.

    Therefore, we reject any ideology

• which would legitimate forms of injustice and any doctrine which is unwilling to resist such an ideology in the name of the gospel.

5. We believe that, in obedience to Jesus Christ, its only head, the church is called to confess and to do all these things, even though the authorities and human laws might forbid them and punishment and suffering be the consequence (Eph. 4:15-16; Acts 5:29-33; 1 Peter 2:18-25; 1 Peter 3:15-18).

Jesus is Lord.

To the one and only God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, be the honor and the glory for ever and ever.

Note: This is a translation of the original Afrikaans text of the confession as it was adopted by the synod of the Dutch Reformed Mission Church in South Africa in 1986. In 1994 the Dutch Reformed Mission Church and the Dutch Reformed Church in Africa united to form the Uniting Reformed Church in Southern Africa (URCSA). This inclusive language text was prepared by the Office of Theology and Worship, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).

-5-

A SHAMEFUL LETTER FROM AUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN SEMINARY



I was disappointed to receive a statement from the faculty of Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary. Our denomination is getting ready for its national meeting where one of the hot issues will be same gender marriage. The faculty of APTS has unanimously voted to urge “mutual forbearance” from both sides, which sounds nice, but “mutual forbearance” means something very different for the two sides. For those who have been denied equal rights, the concern is that they not press too quickly to be treated fairly. For those who would deny equal rights to GLBT persons, the primary concern is that they not leave the denomination. It isn’t hard to tell who really counts.

I would understand such a statement if there really were two extremist groups battling one another, but one side is simply asking for the same rights the other already has. Can that really be classified as a lack of forbearance? What GLBT Presbyterian has ever tried to deny marriage to heterosexual Presbyterians? What GLBT Presbyterian has fought against heterosexual ordination? If only one side is attacking the other, and APTS pretends both sides are equally at fault, has it not in fact sided with the attacker?

If the faculty of Austin Presbyterian Seminary believe those denied justice should wait patiently, then what are they to be waiting patiently for? Are they to be waiting patiently for all their oppressors to die before the Presbyterian Church will show them the dignity they deserve today? Are they to be waiting patiently for a time when it will be economically and culturally costless for the Presbyterian Church to do the right thing? Are they to be waiting patiently for future church leaders to emerge who will have the courage we lack?

APTS is my Alma mater, I owe them much, but this letter is a source of great shame. I wish instead of pretending to be evenhanded they would come out with a gay bashing statement, because that is what their letter really amounts to. To tell the oppressor and oppressed to show mutual forbearance, is to pretend the oppression isn’t even there.

Playing it safe

I know lots of clergy who say they do not speak up publicly for marriage equality, yet support it privately. They say they want to minister to all of their congregation no matter what their political beliefs. They say the people who are fighting marriage equality are kind and wonderful people who are hurt when confronted on their homophobia. They say to make people uncomfortable in their prejudice is itself a kind of intolerance. And, I have little doubt, had these clergy served two hundred years ago, they would have used the same excuses not to address slavery.

A LOOK AT WORLD RELIGIONS AND WHAT THEY CAN TEACH CHRISTIANITY

(this is the handout for today’s class)

DHAMMAPADA (OF BUDDHISM, TRANSLATION BY THOMAS BYRON)
“TWINS”

We are what we think.
All that we are arises with our thoughts.
With our thoughts we make the world. Speak or act with an impure mind
And trouble will follow you
As the wheel follows the ox that draws the cart.
We are what we think.
All that we are arises with our thoughts.
With our thoughts we make the world. Speak or act with a pure mind
And happiness will follow you
As your shadow, unshakable.
”Look how he abused me and hurt me, How he threw me down and robbed me.”
Live with such thoughts and you live in hate.
”Look how he abused me and hurt me, How he threw me down and robbed me.”
Abandon such thoughts, and live in love.
In this world
Hate never yet dispelled hate.
Only love dispels hate.
This is the law,
Ancient and inexhaustible.

(Did you notice the part MLK quoted?)
JAMES (CHRISTIANITY): “TAMING THE TONGUE”
3 Not many of you should become teachers, my fellow believers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly. 2 We all stumble in many ways. Anyone who is never at fault in what they say is perfect, able to keep their whole body in check.
3 When we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we can turn the whole animal. 4 Or take ships as an example. Although they are so large and are driven by strong winds, they are steered by a very small rudder wherever the pilot wants to go. 5 Likewise, the tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark. 6 The tongue also is a fire, a world of evil among the parts of the body. It corrupts the whole body, sets the whole course of one’s life on fire, and is itself set on fire by hell.
7 All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles and sea creatures are being tamed and have been tamed by mankind, 8 but no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison.
9 With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse human beings, who have been made in God’s likeness. 10 Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this should not be. 11 Can both fresh water and salt water flow from the same spring? 12 My brothers and sisters, can a fig tree bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Neither can a salt spring produce fresh water.

Sand Castles



Modern religion faces a tremendous challenge in maintaining the claim that life has a purpose. After Darwin showed that a creationist view does not fully explain our world, it is no longer fully honest to derive our life’s meaning from a creationist narrative. Entropy appears to be a law of the universe. The universe seems more like a temporary wind up toy than an eternal progression. Whatever meaning is found in such a universe cannot be to amass any treasure or to accomplish any goal. In an evolving universe, there are no such final resting places.

Still, we do experience meaning in living. When we build a sand castle, we do not need to pretend that our accomplishment is permanent. When we eat a meal, it does not diminish our pleasure to know that we will soon need to eat again. When we go to Las Vegas, the randomness of the situation is part of the fun. A roulette wheel that was rigged in our favor, might be profitable, but would lose the thrill of the game.

The Stoics believed in a cosmos such as ours. They taught that our purpose is to be like an actor who cannot control the script but still finds great meaning in his or her art. We do not need an outside plot line to give our lives meaning. Our “purpose” is found in manifesting what it means to be human no matter what is happening. This, for us, is meaning and peace and happiness; not to find these treasures, but to create them in whatever circumstance we find ourselves..

Meaning is found in knowing we are the ephemeral expressions of an eternal music, and in joining the dance.

We are not the orphans of nature

 

Every animal in nature comes into the world with a set of instructions. Birds are born, if not knowing what to sing, with a predisposition to join in when they hear the song of their species. Birds are born with a predisposition to build a nest, to fly in certain directions at certain times of the year. Seeds are also born with instructions, as are insects.

I do not believe that human beings, alone in the world, are born without instructions, I do believe our consciousness is so complicated that we can easily lose our homing beacon.

We are not the orphans of nature. We are not truly outside of nature at all, it just looks that way to our frightened and confused minds. One purpose of religion, whether or not we call it by that name, is to reconnect, to re-establish contact. Whether or not we find the symbol “God” helpful in expressing it, religion is remembering our home in that primordial mystery out of which everything shines.

I AM



When I was a child I often felt like I was suffocating in church. I knew that truth could not be as small as what I had been taught. When I got to college I went to a nearby bookstore called, “Grok.” I asked the clerk to introduce me to new ways of approaching reality that weren’t covered in my Sunday School. One of the books he recommended was the Bhagavad Gita of Hinduism. As I read the following verse, I remembered the “I am” sayings of Jesus. I began to explore the possibility that Jesus wasn’t calling us to Christianity (which didn’t even exist at the time) or if, perhaps, like Krishna, he was speaking poetically as life itself and was calling us to our own cosmic roots:

“That one who sees me in everything
and everything within me
will not be lost to me, nor
will I ever be lost to that one.

That one who is rooted in oneness
realizes that I am
in every being; wherever
that one goes, he or she remains in me.

When one sees all being as equal
in suffering or in joy
because they are like him or herself,
that one has grown perfect in yoga.”

– Krishna, speaking in the Bhagavad Gita

Apostles’ Creed for Everyone

Apostles’ Creed for Everyone
 
(A translation by Jim Rigby)
 
Every religion is a particular expression of the universal human experience. The original word for “creed” in Greek meant “symbol.” When the original mystical religion we now call “Christianity” was translated into Latin, it fell from a religion of awareness to a dogmatic sect that unnecessarily divided people. What follows is a translation of the Apostles’ Creed based getting back to ways the Greek symbols might call us to our common life with others.
To be Christian means to accept Jesus as one’s model for what it means to be a human in the cosmos. There is no reason why we who have chosen Christianity as our path cannot sing our hymn in harmony with those who use a different particular symbol to open to the universal. It is not possible to obey Jesus’ command to be a good neighbor with all if our hymn to life is, itself, partisan.
This translation is a work in progress, so feel free to take a stab at saying it in a way that is better for you. Can a Jewish, Muslim or atheistic person find a way of singing the hymn in their own key? Surely, each path will say things that sound very different from the Christian version. My hope (impossible though it may be) is to affirm the central hymn of Christianity in a particular way that calls us a Christian community to our common experience with every other human, believers and skeptics alike. Surely we can all find a way through our own particular expression, to affirm something we all know is bigger than any of us.

I trust in the source, parent of all being, ultimate power, creative principle of all that is,


And in the human one, our guide, a unique manifestation of the source,
Conceived by the spirit of love, born of faithfulness,
suffered under political oppression, was executed, died and buried,
Descending to the very depths of nonbeing; on the third day was
found alive again in human solidarity: rising to the highest, perfectly
at one with the source, thereafter, became a standard for living and dying.


I trust in the spirit of life, the universality of faithfulness, the unity of 
all who are kind and just,
that no mistake is final, that love does not die with the body, and that
life itself is eternal.

orthodoxy and heresy

Every orthodoxy was a heresy in its own day. 

Not all heresy is true, but every new truth begins as a heresy to someone. 

Heresy is often what truth looks like as it is being born. 

Orthodoxy is often what truth looks like as it dies.

What orthodoxy cannot establish by reason,

It imposes with scepter

Still new truth triumphs inevitably

As grass cracking up through the pavement.

“Moses Tied His Ass to a Tree”

 

The people of a village once looked out to see one of their most pious neighbors tied to a tree. Rushing out to release him, they were stunned to discover that he had tied the knots himself. “Moses tied his ass to a tree,” the man said sternly, “and I’m going to follow the Moses!”

“But the word “ass” originally meant “donkey, not rear end,” someone replied. ”Moses wouldn’t want you to suffer like this.” The man shook his head, “God’s word is unchanging. If you want to pick and choose what you’re going to obey that’s fine, but I take it all literally.”

Eventually, there was just a skeleton tied to the tree. The people were so impressed by the faith of the man that they built an altar with a sign that read, “You can be like this man if you will take the Bible literally.”